Site icon Inmathi

DMK poll manifesto: Some good, a lot bad

The DMK manifesto for the 2024 Lok Sabha elections is typical in the sense that it promises loads of freebies even while fleshing out some worthwhile points regarding the long-term needs of the people.

Today, the discourse on freebies has evolved to judging freebie promises on two counts: rational and irrational. While this, in and of itself, is highly debatable and whether any freebie is rational at all, it still marks an evolution in political discourse.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has assured that it will take up a Public Interest Litigation on freebie promises by political parties ahead of the 2024 general elections. This has put the onus on political parties. They need to explain how the government can mobilize the finances needed to pay for the freebies.

The DMK’s manifesto has given importance to youth, women, farmers, and somewhat aged people. Alas, it has not given due importance to the issues of urban growth centres which are the carriers of economic growth and job creation. Reforms of key state PSUs are ignored.

Most parties go silent on what rationality or evidence supports their policy proposals in manifestos. If that’s the case with policies, we can only imagine the case with freebies. By and large, actual implementation of schemes and programmes have fallen far short of tall poll eve promises, in any case.

The DMK’s manifesto has given importance to youth, women, farmers, and somewhat aged people. Alas, it has not given due importance to the issues of urban growth centres which are the carriers of economic growth and job creation. Reforms of key state PSUs are ignored.

Also Read: When is a freebie welfare expenditure?

Reckless freebies are unwarranted, given the overall economic performance and historical decline in poverty levels.  Targeted assistance to specific demographic groups using technological tools to reduce leakages are the need of the hour.

Below are the DMK manifesto’s freebie promises.

These freebies will erode the already stressed financial health of the states as well as the centre. Several lakhs of crores would be needed for nationwide implementation. In a mature democratic system of governance, such promises should be supported by specific proposals on how these schemes will be funded, in the interest of accountability.

Most parties go silent on what rationality or evidence supports their policy proposals in manifestos. If that’s the case with policies, we can only imagine the case with freebies. By and large, actual implementation of schemes and programmes have fallen far short of tall poll eve promises, in any case.

The DMK government’s pilot urban employment scheme in cities like Coimbatore has been a disaster. There’s a labour shortage in several sectors and there are few takers for this scheme. Yes, the DMK has gone ahead and promised a MGNREGA-like scheme for urban areas, guaranteeing 100 days of employment in urban areas.

Also Read:  TN needs road map for senior citizens’ welfare

The following promises are, however, positive and could contribute to the growth of state economies and the center’s.

Perhaps, the Supreme Court can direct the Election Commission to appoint an inclusive expert committee that would diligently monitor or evaluate the financial implications of promises in poll manifestos. This would help voters make informed choices.

(The author is an economist and public policy expert)

Share the Article
Exit mobile version